Catch-Up Post of Mediocrity (and Occasional Brilliance)

A Christmas Carol (WE)

Jim Broadbent is incapable of acting badly, but his Ebeneezer Scrooge was essentially phoned-in. And the prices they charged for a rickety set and play-sort-of-within-a-play that didn’t know whether it wanted to be funny or serious were utterly ridiculous. A blatant attempt to rip off the holiday market, and I was not in the mood to be fleeced. A serious disappointment.

Jane Eyre (NT)

This adaptation, brought from the Bristol Old Vic and directed by Sally Cookson, had its moments of pleasure. It was well-acted throughout, with Madeleine Worrall playing Jane from (literally) infancy to adulthood, and Felix Hayes a fiery Rochester. Melanie Marshall’s stunning voice saved the evening for me, as I was not enormously fond of the experimental nature of the production. It also featured the first (but not the last) instance of a person playing an animal (here a dog) that I would see at the NT in January.

As You Like It (NT)

The NT clearly spent a lot of money on this production, and the transition from the first act’s office to the “forest” was visually stunning, and even appeared slightly dangerous for the participants. But playing the first act in an office was unduly constrained and somewhat dull, and I could not see any creative justification for it. Generally well acted, but Rosalie Craig’s Rosalind did not, for me, have her usual luminous brilliance. More people playing animals in this one, sheep this time, which they did almost disconcertingly well. An odd production and, for me, unsuccessful.

Grey Gardens (Southwark)

Sheila Hancock was heartbreaking and hilarious, and Jenna Russell very strong indeed in this stripped-down version of a Broadway hit. Well staged and enjoyable, this rumination on the decay of an American family (cousins of Jackie Kennedy Onassis) provided a great deal of pleasure. A generally strong supporting cast sang beautifully and recreated an affluent inter-war American household with great attention to detail (good accents throughout!). I didn’t love it as it was very uneven, with the second half much better than the first, but I liked it very much.

Husbands and Sons (NT)

Oh my, is it ever grim up North. This combination of three of D.H. Lawrence’s plays about miners and their wives and mothers was beautifully staged, impeccably acted and utter misery from start to finish. I booked for Anne-Marie Duff and she did not disappoint, with her exquisite acting in the final scene just about making up for all the suffering that had gone before. One for the die-hards only.

Ellen Terry with Eileen Atkins (Sam Wanamaker Playhouse at the Globe)

This was a rather wonderful exploration of Shakespeare’s female characters. Based on lectures that the actress Ellen Terry developed with Henry Irving, Eileen Atkins played excerpts from some of Shakespeare’s greatest plays and provided new insights into the motivations of Desdemona, Juliet, Portia, Beatrice and other heroines. I was glad that it was only 70 minutes long, however, as the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse is, while a bijou gem, deeply uncomfortable as a theatre. An acting master class.

Rabbit Hole (Hampstead)

This emotionally devastating exploration of a child’s death has a strong cast, led by Claire Skinner and Tom Goodman-Hill, and is well acted throughout. But I’m afraid the tragedy lost its effect on me because of the terrible American accents (with the honourable exception of Penny Downie’s Nat, whose accent is very good). The play is very strongly set in Westchester County, but many people who live there have generic east coast accents. It’s really not necessary to try for Yonkers when Manhattan will do.

The Homecoming (WE)

A 50th anniversary production of one of Pinter’s most shocking plays. It remains shocking, but possibly for reasons other than those intended. This sordid exploration of men’s lust and women’s power retains its dramatic force, but reveals rather more about the playwright than I suspect he intended. John Simm as Lenny, Ron Cook as Max, Keith Allen as Sam, Gary Kemp’s Teddy and John Macmillan’s Joey are all excellent, with Simm and Cook as particular highlights. But it is Gemma Chan’s Ruth who intrigues us most, as she shows us the woman behind the fantasy. Worth booking for her performance.

Catch-up Post: Plays Part 1

And here is the post with a few words about all the plays I’ve seen over the past year. Looking back, I saw many good plays and very few poor productions.

Bakkhai (Almeida): Not quite the stunner that Oresteia was, but a very memorable afternoon. Ben Whishaw’s Dionysus was clearly influenced by the likes of Conchita Wurst and Russell Brand, but memorably his own. But it was Bertie Carvel who stole the show for me, both as a buttoned-up Pentheus (channelling Margaret Atwood as he whispered, “It’s very important that the women don’t make fun of me”) and a suitably mad Agave. Compelling, but I could have done with less of the Chorus.

The Heresy of Love (Globe): I had not previously heard of Helen Edmundson’s play, but was entranced by this exploration of love and faith in 17th century Mexico. Naomi Frederick was forthright, elegant, and ultimately very moving as Sor Juana.

The Motherfucker with the Hat (NT): Definitely not the usual National Theatre fare, this New York-set play about infidelity and a conman trying to go straight had a vivid, earthy (and profane) energy. For once, the American accents were spot-on throughout. The acting was very strong, but the play ultimately a trifle shallow.

Everyman (NT): An interesting experiment. Well-acted by a strong cast, including Chiwetel Ejiofor, written by one of my favourite poets (Carol Ann Duffy), and yet it didn’t completely grab me. The subject matter (meaning of life) was a little too well worn.

Oresteia (Almeida): An incredibly strong beginning to the Almeida’s Greeks season. It was very long, but not difficult to sit through as the intervals were well timed. And it was beyond compelling. Lia Williams was mesmerising as Klytemnestra, Angus Wright’s agony as Agamemnon seemed to come from his very bones, and the death of Iphigenia was almost unwatchable. Its West End transfer is richly deserved.

The Elephant Man (WE): I’ll admit it, I was there for Bradley Cooper. And he did not disappoint, contorting his body admirably and speaking with a suitably distorted but accurate mid-Victorian accent. The play, however, was short and so pointless that I couldn’t quite believe it was over, as so little had happened.

Constellations (WE): I had missed this play the first time around, so I was very pleased to see it return to Trafalgar Studios this summer. It was well-acted and the physics was interesting, but I didn’t find the conceit of the repetition as moving as I was clearly intended to. Science and art can be combined beautifully (as in Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia, the most sublime example) but sometimes the science can be just a gimmick.

Rules for Living (NT): An uproariously funny play about a dysfunctional family at Christmas, oddly scheduled in the NT’s spring season. It would have been much more suited to a Christmas season. The “rules” were a unique concept and the scoreboard certainly noisy, but not necessary for the family dynamics to play out. A delightful curio.

Temple (Donmar): A play about the dilemma facing the leadership of St Paul’s Cathedral during the time its courtyard was taken over by Occupy. Simon Russell Beale turned the part of the finely tuned senior cleric into an exquisitely tortured man undergoing a profound moral dilemma. Paul Higgins (always a favourite since his legendary Jamie in The Thick of It) was marvellously passionate as the Canon Chancellor.

Man and Superman (NT): This should not have worked. Over 3 hours long, with an unrelated and frankly bizarre second act, lots of Shavian repetition and a leading man (Ralph Fiennes) who was much too old for the part. It was wonderful, engaging from start to finish and with beautiful chemistry between Fiennes and Indira Varma. We don’t see enough Shaw. More like that from the NT, please.

The Beaux Stratagem (NT): I should have loved this Restoration comedy. It had elements of country-house farce, which I normally adore, it was strongly acted and had some lovely singing. And yet I was bored stiff and longing for it to be over. There just wasn’t enough zing, and I didn’t care about any of the characters. A dud.

Peter Pan (Open Air): This production made me nervous at the beginning. Linking Peter Pan’s lost boys to the lost boys of WWI was an inspired and moving idea. It was just rather difficult to explain to the child accompanying me, who was understandably asking questions about why the boys were hurt and who was the enemy. But it was a lovely production, if a bit challenging for the lower end of the recommended age bracket.

American Buffalo (WE): Plenty of star power was on offer with this David Mamet three-hander, which involved John Goodman, Damian Lewis and Tom Sturridge. It was very well acted (particularly by Sturridge, who I had never seen before) but the play itself was about stupid people and I found it a rather stupid play. Mamet and I clearly do not get on.

Farinelli and the King (Globe): A gem. Mary Rylance’s performance in this play about the effect of the castrato Farinelli on his King of Spain was a quiet miracle, his eyes alone conveying every emotion that one could wish. Stunning singing from Iestyn Davies. I will go again during the West End transfer but that first experience in the tiny Sam Wanamaker Playhouse will be a treasured memory.

The Last Days of Troy, Globe

The story is, of course, well-known, and thematically well-suited to the Globe. The play is a new version by Simon Armitage. The first act has several alternating story lines; first, we follow the Greeks, with Agamemnon and Odysseus bickering with Achilles and Patroclus. On the Trojan side, Helen and Andromache are somewhat stereotypical frenemies, whilst Priam and Hector discuss strategy and Paris whinges. The third story line is meant to be the lightest, with Zeus and Hera a down-at-heel married couple, with Athene their seemingly teenaged daughter.

As seems to be prevalent lately, the second half of the play is much stronger than the first. The Greek and Trojan story lines were strong throughout, but the tone of the gods’ storyline was slightly off. The jokes fell a little flat, and whilst it was well acted, did not seem completely in line with the rest of the story. The use of Clare Calbraith to play Thetis as well as Andromache was somewhat confusing, as the costumes were very similar and it did not seem to me that the character of Thetis was particularly necessary to the plot.

The casting is excellent. Lily Cole was a tall and very beautiful Helen, although it was difficult to tell whether her impassive affect was due to the character’s desire to keep her own counsel or simply to stiff acting. I will choose to believe the former. Clare Calbraith and Simon Harrison were an affectionate and moving Andromache and Hector, and it seemed to me they had better chemistry than Helen and Paris. Tom Stuart was, however, an excellent Paris, perfectly cast and nailing the character’s wispiness, well contrasted with Hector’s dominance.

On the Greek side, David Birrell was a forthright Agamemnon and Colin Tierney a wily and cunning Odysseus, who reminded me physically of a young Ralph Fiennes. Jake Fairbrother was an extremely athletic Achilles, and his grief for Patroclus very affecting. Amongst the gods, Richard Bremmer’s Zeus was tramp-like and bedraggled, and Gillian Bevan a nagging, washer-woman Hera. The gods’ characters were fully developed by the end of the play, but much less so in the first half.

The story is a familiar one. Armitage implies a particular relationship between Achilles and Patroclus, and Helen’s actions suggest that she will miss Andromache the most of all the Trojans. Otherwise, the story is played straight, with plenty of action and some excellent wrestling and sword-fighting. Less bloody than some of the Globe’s productions this season, there was at least one fainter on the day I attended (I suspect due to the heat). This might be a particularly good Globe production for younger audience members, as the language is straightforward and the action constant throughout. Recommended.

Antony and Cleopatra, Globe

Sometimes I think that those in charge of productions forget that (a) we live on a rock in the North Atlantic and (b) Shakespeare’s Globe is exposed to the elements. I have rarely felt such sympathy for actors as I did at today’s freezing, rainy performance of Antony and Cleopatra, shivering even though I was warmly dressed and watching Eve Best, Sirine Saba and Rosie Hilal scamper about the stage in skimpy “Egyptian” draperies, being rained on at every turn and, in the case of the latter two, with dirty costumes throughout due to the directorial choice to end the pre-show dance rolling around on the stage. I hope someone was waiting backstage with warm robes and copious quantities of tea.

I have a love/hate relationship with the Globe. Not so much with the theatre and its management, as I usually enjoy the productions themselves, but its status as a tourist attraction means that quite a lot of the patrons are not particularly interested in theatre and/or do not speak English. Accordingly, there is always a low level hum, particularly at the beginning of plays, when people are informed that no, you cannot sit on the stairs or block the exits as they are fire hazards, and yes, those rules still apply even when it is raining. These discussions, combined with the ludicrously loud rain, meant that the first few scenes were difficult to hear.

However, soon enough both the crowd and the weather subsided sufficiently. Eve Best (Cleopatra) was a suitably imperious Cleopatra, capriciously berating her women and slaves one minute and praising them the next. She was every inch a Queen, and you could easily see a man losing his head over her. I was nervous for her at several points as she cavorted around the stage which was fairly wet; she seemed to have already had a mishap as her left ankle was taped up. Clive Wood made a convincing ageing lion as Antony, albeit a slightly softly spoken lion. They exhibited some passion towards each other, but frankly more tenderness, which was an interesting choice. The acting by both was superb, but I did not detect notable chemistry between them.

Jolyon Coy made an excellent Octavius Caesar (Octavian). He spoke clearly and beautifully and his conflicting desires were apparent to even those of us fortunate enough to be seated towards the back of the theatre. Praise must also go to Phil Daniels, a delightful Enobarbus (assisted by the fact that, of course, he gets all the best lines).

This Antony and Cleopatra is a well done (if unsuitable for the climate) production, continuing the Globe’s tradition of somewhat blood-soaked plays following Titus Andronicus. Make sure to come back to your seat in good time after the interval to see some interesting soothsaying; if you’re squeamish, however, you might want to stay away until the last moment. I must end by praising the two little girls (no older than eight) who were seated near me and who did not utter a peep during the entire performance, even when one fell over (presumably asleep) and hit her head. I think they must have been exceptional, however, and generally do not recommend this one for the under-12s.